Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,136,112 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,623,141 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 0.81%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 7.6% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 48.9% | 26.2% |
Range | 41.2% | 25.0% |
Mean | 16.8% | 14.0% |
Median | 15.0% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |