Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Immigrants from Middle Africa
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,541,318 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,623,141 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 2.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 33.8% | 26.2% |
Range | 31.8% | 25.0% |
Mean | 15.1% | 14.0% |
Median | 13.8% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |