Sudanese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Immigrants from Middle Africa
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,113,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,623,141 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 0.050%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 43.0% | 26.2% |
| Range | 41.4% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 16.5% | 14.0% |
| Median | 14.4% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.52%), French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |