Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Ghana Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Immigrants from Ghana
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Immigrants from Ghana
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Ghana Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,136,112 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,796,197 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.060%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Immigrants from Ghana |
| Minimum | 7.6% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 48.9% | 43.0% |
| Range | 41.2% | 42.1% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 14.3% |
| Median | 15.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Immigrants from Ghana by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |