Shoshone vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Shoshone
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Shoshone
Chickasaw
13.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,615,440 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 2.0%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 42.2% | 33.0% |
| Range | 38.9% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 15.7% | 15.0% |
| Median | 12.9% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.1% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Barbados (13.8%, a difference of 0.020%), West Indian (13.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Haiti (13.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Comanche (13.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (13.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.8% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 13.8% |