Russian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,513,768 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,488,987 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 27.0%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Russian	Immigrants from Micronesia
Minimum	1.6%	1.0%
Maximum	64.7%	19.3%
Range	63.1%	18.3%
Mean	8.7%	7.2%
Median	4.1%	5.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.3%	4.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.3%	7.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.0%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.4%	4.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.3%	4.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Russians by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Serbians	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 4.3%
British	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 4.3%
Australians	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 4.3%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 4.3%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 4.3%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 4.3%
Welsh	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 4.3%
Austrians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.3%
French	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.7 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 4.3%
Czechoslovakians	99.7 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.6 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 4.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	14.4 /100 \| #210	Poor 5.5%
Nigerians	14.3 /100 \| #211	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Thailand	14.0 /100 \| #212	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Liberia	13.3 /100 \| #213	Poor 5.5%
Iroquois	13.1 /100 \| #214	Poor 5.5%
Armenians	12.8 /100 \| #215	Poor 5.5%
Potawatomi	12.4 /100 \| #216	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	11.3 /100 \| #217	Poor 5.5%