Pima vs Yugoslavian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Yugoslavian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Pima
Yugoslavians
11.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Yugoslavian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,466,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,040,939 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 4.6%, a difference of 145.8%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 14.3% |
| Range | 96.4% | 13.4% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 4.9% |
| Median | 9.9% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.2% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.7% | 3.3% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Western Europe (4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (4.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Native Hawaiian (4.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Asian (4.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Portuguese | 98.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 98.3 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 98.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 97.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Asians | 97.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 97.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |