Icelander vs Immigrants from Norway Female Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants from Norway
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants from Norway
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants from Norway Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,674,936 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants from Norway |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 0.68% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 41.6% |
| Range | 32.9% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 10.8% |
| Median | 10.4% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants from Norway by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.18%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |