Icelander vs Immigrants from Germany Female Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants from Germany
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants from Germany
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
74.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants from Germany Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,610,140 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 0.90%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants from Germany |
Minimum | 0.47% | 7.5% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 32.9% | 92.5% |
Mean | 11.8% | 23.6% |
Median | 10.4% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 28.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 20.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants from Germany by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |