Guyanese vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Guyanese
Australian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Guyanese
Australians
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,831,984 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,779,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 50.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guyanese | Australian |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 73.3% |
| Range | 12.4% | 72.2% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 6.5% |
| Median | 5.6% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guyanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.56%), Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and Ute (6.4%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |