Cypriot vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cypriot
Australian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Cypriots
Australians
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,691,047 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,779,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 4.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cypriot | Australian |
| Minimum | 0.39% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 7.7% | 73.3% |
| Range | 7.3% | 72.2% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 6.5% |
| Median | 2.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cypriots by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Danish (4.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Scandinavian (4.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Finnish (4.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |