Delaware vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Delaware
Australian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Delaware
Australians
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
73.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Delaware vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,946,385 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Delaware and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,779,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 17.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Delaware | Australian |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 28.8% | 73.3% |
| Range | 27.9% | 72.2% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 6.5% |
| Median | 5.6% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Delaware by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Delaware are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Sri Lankan (5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |