Delaware vs Immigrants from China Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Delaware
Immigrants from China
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Delaware
Immigrants from China
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
73.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Delaware vs Immigrants from China Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,946,385 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Delaware and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,197,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Delaware | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 28.8% | 20.0% |
| Range | 27.9% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 5.8% |
| Median | 5.6% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Delaware and Immigrants from China by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Delaware are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Sri Lankan (5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Hmong (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |