Creek vs Ethiopian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Creek
Ethiopian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Creek
Ethiopians
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Ethiopian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,438,059 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,083,750 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 28.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 58.7% | 30.1% |
| Range | 55.8% | 28.6% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 12.6% |
| Median | 19.0% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.8% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Creek by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |