Tsimshian vs Ethiopian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Ethiopian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Ethiopians
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Ethiopian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,083,750 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 27.8% | 30.1% |
| Range | 25.6% | 28.6% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 12.6% |
| Median | 13.1% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Ethiopians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |