Chinese vs Maltese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Maltese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Maltese
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Maltese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,992,298 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 2.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Maltese |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 57.9% | 47.8% |
| Range | 56.4% | 44.8% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 16.8% |
| Median | 11.1% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Maltese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |