Chinese vs Lithuanian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Lithuanian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Lithuanians
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
22.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Lithuanian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,241,212 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 18.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 57.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.4% | 93.3% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 28.6% |
| Median | 11.1% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 20.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 25.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 24.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Norway (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slovene (13.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Laos (13.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Grenada (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 26.6 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 26.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 26.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.0% |
| Liberians | 25.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 23.4 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 23.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.0% |
| Lithuanians | 22.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 21.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.0% |
| Slovenes | 21.6 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.0% |
| Basques | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 20.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.0% |
| Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
| Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |