Chinese vs Czechoslovakian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Czechoslovakian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Czechoslovakians
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Czechoslovakian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,828,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 21.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 57.9% | 80.0% |
| Range | 56.4% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 29.8% |
| Median | 11.1% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 42.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 23.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 18.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Belizean (13.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
| British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |