Immigrants from Guatemala vs Inupiat Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Inupiat
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Inupiat
24.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Inupiat Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,364,568 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 24.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,986,972 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 23.1%, a difference of 4.3%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 90.5% | 73.6% |
| Range | 87.4% | 65.3% |
| Mean | 32.5% | 30.3% |
| Median | 27.7% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.6% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.1% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Inupiat by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Bangladeshi (24.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 0.86%), German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and Guatemalan (23.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |