Hmong vs British West Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hmong
British West Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Hmong
British West Indians
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs British West Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,642,418 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 23.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,955,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128 and weighted average of 22.8%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hmong | British West Indian |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 53.4% | 61.7% |
| Range | 49.1% | 60.3% |
| Mean | 25.8% | 22.6% |
| Median | 22.9% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.5% | 26.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and British West Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.48%), Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |