Belgian vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Belgian
Bhutanese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Belgians
Bhutanese
4.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belgian vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 352,443,017 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,291,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 3.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Belgian | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.38% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 49.5% |
Range | 22.5% | 48.9% |
Mean | 4.0% | 5.1% |
Median | 3.5% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Belgians and Bhutanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Iranian (4.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (4.2%, a difference of 0.13%), English (4.2%, a difference of 0.19%), European (4.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and French Canadian (4.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (4.1%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |