Romanian In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Romanian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Romanian In Labor Force | Age 45-54
83.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
75.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,704,914 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Romanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175 and weighted average of 83.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.28% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Romanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Romanians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 within an area, or if Romanians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Romanians by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from France (83.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Czechoslovakian (83.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Okinawan (83.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Soviet Union (83.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (83.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
| Ghanaians | 79.5 /100 | #138 | Good 83.0% |
| Scandinavians | 78.5 /100 | #139 | Good 83.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.3 /100 | #140 | Good 83.0% |
| Immigrants from Haiti | 77.9 /100 | #141 | Good 83.0% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 77.8 /100 | #142 | Good 83.0% |
| Okinawans | 77.0 /100 | #143 | Good 83.0% |
| Soviet Union | 76.8 /100 | #144 | Good 83.0% |
| Romanians | 75.4 /100 | #145 | Good 83.0% |
| Immigrants from France | 75.3 /100 | #146 | Good 83.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 83.0% |
| Immigrants from Nigeria | 74.1 /100 | #148 | Good 83.0% |
| Immigrants from Sweden | 73.3 /100 | #149 | Good 82.9% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 72.6 /100 | #150 | Good 82.9% |
| Koreans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 82.9% |
| Slavs | 71.5 /100 | #152 | Good 82.9% |
Romanian In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian Data | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Data |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 50.2% |
| Maximum | 35.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 35.4% | 49.8% |
| Mean | 8.8% | 82.8% |
| Median | 6.4% | 83.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 78.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 89.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 12.6% |
Correlation Details
| Romanian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 284,453,706 | 82.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 62,611,503 | 83.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 15,563,253 | 83.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 7,466,831 | 83.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 3,347,887 | 83.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.46% | 1,442,105 | 83.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 926,443 | 84.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 580,288 | 83.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 341,002 | 84.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 297,832 | 84.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 217,720 | 79.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 38,992 | 79.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.35% | 122,323 | 82.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.63% | 85,739 | 73.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 64,919 | 85.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 65,774 | 80.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.48% | 7,182 | 89.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.78% | 3,368 | 84.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 4,057 | 83.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 7,065 | 80.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 3,566 | 87.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 18,339 | 78.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.97% | 4,839 | 67.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 411 | 76.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.57% | 4,903 | 71.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.84% | 3,858 | 100.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 214 | 100.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.41% | 378 | 87.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 13 | 100.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.96% | 377 | 100.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.30% | 1,990 | 78.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.90% | 3,586 | 76.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.32% | 659 | 100.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.55% | 919 | 89.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.56% | 5,501 | 65.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.74% | 426 | 58.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.10% | 1,885 | 97.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.50% | 40 | 73.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.36% | 247 | 100.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.88% | 353 | 82.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.75% | 278 | 78.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.36% | 220 | 100.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.61% | 319 | 100.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 783 | 55.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.18% | 962 | 91.7% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.70% | 1,668 | 50.2% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.59% | 98 | 51.7% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.48% | 93 | 100.0% |