Inupiat vs Immigrants from Ecuador Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Inupiat
Immigrants from Ecuador
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Inupiat
Immigrants from Ecuador
42.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Ecuador Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,320,700 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 42.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,883,052 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678 and weighted average of 42.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Minimum | 12.1% | 34.8% |
| Maximum | 81.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 69.7% | 65.2% |
| Mean | 42.6% | 47.2% |
| Median | 43.0% | 44.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.1% | 40.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.0% | 49.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Immigrants from Ecuador by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Sierra Leonean (42.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Africa (42.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (42.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (43.1%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.1% |