Inupiat vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Inupiat
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Inupiat
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
42.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,320,700 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 42.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,644,825 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138 and weighted average of 43.3%, a difference of 2.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Immigrants from Sierra Leone |
Minimum | 12.1% | 21.3% |
Maximum | 81.8% | 59.2% |
Range | 69.7% | 37.9% |
Mean | 42.6% | 43.1% |
Median | 43.0% | 44.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.1% | 38.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.0% | 48.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Immigrants from Sierra Leone by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (42.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Yuman (43.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Guatemalan (43.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Native/Alaskan (43.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |