Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Fiji
Immigrants from Jordan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Fiji
Immigrants from Jordan
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,738,910 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.381 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Fiji | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 3.9% | 6.7% |
Range | 2.5% | 6.3% |
Mean | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 0.92% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.54% | 0.99% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.53% | 0.98% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |