Immigrants from Fiji vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Fiji
Bhutanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Fiji
Bhutanese
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
4.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Fiji vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,738,910 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.381 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,292,805 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 8.9%.
![Immigrants from Fiji vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/hearing-disability/immigrants-from-fiji-vs-bhutanese-hearing-disability-chart.webp)
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Fiji | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 3.9% | 10.5% |
Range | 2.5% | 8.8% |
Mean | 2.9% | 4.0% |
Median | 2.9% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.54% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.53% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Fiji by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |