Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Immigrants from Jordan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Immigrants from Jordan
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.17%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 0.070% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 9.7% | 6.7% |
Range | 9.7% | 6.3% |
Mean | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 0.92% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 0.99% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 0.98% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |