Immigrants from Serbia vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Immigrants from Jordan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Immigrants from Jordan
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
51.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,744,668 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 3.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 7.8% | 6.7% |
Range | 6.0% | 6.3% |
Mean | 3.6% | 2.9% |
Median | 3.2% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 0.92% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 0.99% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 0.98% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Indonesian (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Romania (3.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Panamanian (3.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Armenian (3.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |