Chilean vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Immigrants from Jordan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chileans
Immigrants from Jordan
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,625,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.41%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 0.32% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 6.9% | 6.7% |
Range | 6.5% | 6.3% |
Mean | 3.4% | 2.9% |
Median | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 0.92% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 0.99% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 0.98% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |