Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Immigrants from Jordan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Immigrants from Jordan
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,463,396 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 10.4%.
![Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/hearing-disability/immigrants-from-laos-vs-immigrants-from-jordan-hearing-disability-chart.webp)
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 0.79% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 12.0% | 6.7% |
Range | 11.2% | 6.3% |
Mean | 3.8% | 2.9% |
Median | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.0% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.92% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 0.99% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 0.98% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |