Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Central America
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Central America
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Central America Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,848,702 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,120,353 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 17.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Central America |
Minimum | 0.61% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 26.4% |
Range | 12.3% | 25.2% |
Mean | 5.1% | 6.5% |
Median | 4.8% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.85% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |