Immigrants from China vs Black/African American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Black/African American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Blacks/African Americans
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Black/African American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,848,702 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,519,006 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.835 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 41.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Black/African American |
Minimum | 0.61% | 5.9% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 14.3% |
Range | 12.3% | 8.4% |
Mean | 5.1% | 8.3% |
Median | 4.8% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 9.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Native/Alaskan (7.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (7.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Navajo (7.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Hopi (7.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and Pueblo (7.6%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |