Immigrants from China vs Lebanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Lebanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Lebanese
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
66.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Lebanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,848,702 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,495,735 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 14.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Lebanese |
Minimum | 0.61% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 27.5% |
Range | 12.3% | 25.3% |
Mean | 5.1% | 8.4% |
Median | 4.8% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 8.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Lebanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |