South American Indian vs Immigrants from Central America Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Immigrants from Central America
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Immigrants from Central America
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Immigrants from Central America Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,869 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,120,353 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 5.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Immigrants from Central America |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 26.4% |
Range | 14.2% | 25.2% |
Mean | 6.5% | 6.5% |
Median | 5.7% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 0.85% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |