Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from France Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Immigrants from France
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Immigrants from France
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from France Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,858,802 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Immigrants from France |
Minimum | 0.070% | 0.48% |
Maximum | 9.7% | 19.7% |
Range | 9.7% | 19.2% |
Mean | 3.1% | 4.7% |
Median | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 4.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from France by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |