Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Europe Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Immigrants from Europe
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Immigrants from Europe
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
22.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Europe Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,917,767 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 7.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Immigrants from Europe |
Minimum | 0.070% | 0.95% |
Maximum | 9.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 9.7% | 99.1% |
Mean | 3.1% | 9.4% |
Median | 2.9% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 15.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 15.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Europe by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Spanish American Indian (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), South African (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (3.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Croatia (3.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |