Austrian vs Immigrants from Philippines 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,869,761 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296 and weighted average of 91.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,073,729 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 91.5%, a difference of 0.21%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Austrian	Immigrants from Philippines
Minimum	70.3%	81.2%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	29.7%	18.8%
Mean	95.7%	93.4%
Median	97.0%	93.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	93.8%	91.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	100.0%	95.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.7%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.6%	3.8%

Demographics Similar to Austrians and Immigrants from Philippines by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Immigrants from Cuba (91.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Potawatomi (91.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (91.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Bangladeshi (91.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Canada (91.4%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Iranian (91.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (91.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Bolivian (91.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Cuban (91.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (91.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Cubans	99.5 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.4 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 91.5%
Iranians	99.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.4 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 91.5%
Bolivians	99.4 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	99.3 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 91.4%
Lebanese	99.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| England	99.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 91.4%
Jordanians	99.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 91.4%
Tsimshian	99.3 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 91.4%
Osage	99.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Germany	99.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 91.4%
Spanish Americans	99.2 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 91.4%
Bangladeshis	99.2 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.2 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Jordan	99.2 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 91.4%
Bhutanese	99.2 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| North America	99.2 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Cuba	99.1 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 91.3%
Austrians	99.0 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 91.3%
Potawatomi	99.0 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 91.3%