Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Immigrants from Nepal
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Immigrants from Nepal
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,522,018 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.17%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Immigrants from Nepal |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 24.8% | 25.5% |
Range | 22.7% | 24.2% |
Mean | 7.7% | 8.5% |
Median | 7.3% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Immigrants from Nepal by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |