Yugoslavian vs Hungarian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Hungarian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Hungarians
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Hungarian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,762,053 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 3.1%.
![Yugoslavian vs Hungarian Family Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/family-poverty/yugoslavians-vs-hungarians-family-poverty-chart.webp)
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Hungarian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 24.8% | 82.8% |
Range | 22.7% | 80.4% |
Mean | 7.7% | 16.1% |
Median | 7.3% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 20.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Hungarians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |