Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Nepal Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Immigrants from Nepal
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Immigrants from Nepal
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Nepal Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,688,907 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Immigrants from Nepal |
Minimum | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 30.2% | 33.0% |
Range | 28.2% | 31.0% |
Mean | 12.4% | 13.1% |
Median | 12.1% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Immigrants from Nepal by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |