Turkish vs Maltese Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Turkish
Maltese
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Turks
Maltese
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.9%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Maltese Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,326,632 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 6.5%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Maltese |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 18.6% |
| Range | 15.5% | 17.4% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 6.9% |
| Median | 7.1% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Maltese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Bolivian (9.3%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Sweden (9.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Norwegian (9.0%, a difference of 0.66%), Immigrants from Japan (9.0%, a difference of 0.93%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Danish (9.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |