Turkish vs Lithuanian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Turkish
Lithuanian
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Turks
Lithuanians
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Lithuanian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,339,892 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 16.7% | 57.6% |
Range | 15.5% | 55.2% |
Mean | 7.6% | 14.8% |
Median | 7.1% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 21.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Lithuanians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Asian (9.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from South Africa (9.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (9.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Russian (9.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Indian (Asian) (9.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Australians | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Russians | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Lithuanians | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Asians | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 9.7% |