Sri Lankan vs Chilean Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Chilean
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Chileans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Chilean Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,283,716 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,625,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.34%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Chilean |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 29.8% | 6.9% |
Range | 28.7% | 6.5% |
Mean | 4.0% | 3.4% |
Median | 2.8% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 4.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Chileans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |