Sri Lankan vs Chilean Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Chilean
Disability
Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Chileans
11.0%
DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
DISABILITY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Chilean Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,510,650 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,664,875 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.69%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Chilean |
Minimum | 4.1% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 31.3% | 24.3% |
Range | 27.2% | 20.2% |
Mean | 11.8% | 11.9% |
Median | 10.8% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Chileans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from France (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lebanon (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (11.0%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Switzerland (11.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Poland (11.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Sri Lankans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | France | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Chileans | 99.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 98.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.1% |