Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Chickasaw
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,745,310 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 4.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Potawatomi | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 59.6% | 33.0% |
| Range | 55.1% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 18.0% | 15.0% |
| Median | 16.2% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |