Immigrants from Switzerland vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Switzerland
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Switzerland
Chickasaw
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
79.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,054,037 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 24.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Switzerland | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.91% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 48.0% | 33.0% |
Range | 47.1% | 30.8% |
Mean | 10.6% | 15.0% |
Median | 8.2% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Switzerland by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |