Immigrants from Chile vs Tsimshian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Tsimshian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Tsimshian
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Tsimshian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,592,418 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 2.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 27.8% |
Range | 20.6% | 25.6% |
Mean | 11.6% | 14.0% |
Median | 11.8% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Tsimshian by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |