Puget Sound Salish vs Egyptian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Egyptian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Egyptians
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Egyptian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,044,429 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.787 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 275,471,686 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.62%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Egyptian |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 26.4% | 28.0% |
| Range | 23.8% | 27.3% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 6.4% |
| Median | 5.1% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Egyptians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Soviet Union (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Palestinian (4.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 92.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 92.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |