Ute vs Cheyenne Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Cheyenne
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Ute
Cheyenne
15.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Cheyenne Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,243,903 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,255,059 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 2.7%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Cheyenne |
| Minimum | 11.8% | 13.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.2% | 86.7% |
| Mean | 45.2% | 44.4% |
| Median | 37.4% | 38.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.8% | 60.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 42.9% | 41.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.5% | 30.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.4% | 29.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Cheyenne by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 0.57%), American (15.8%, a difference of 0.73%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.75%), Blackfeet (15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |