French Canadian vs South African Female Poverty
COMPARE
French Canadian
South African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
French Canadians
South Africans
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian vs South African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,012,927 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,540,648 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.47%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French Canadian | South African |
Minimum | 4.4% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 49.1% | 44.9% |
Range | 44.7% | 42.4% |
Mean | 16.1% | 10.8% |
Median | 12.8% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to French Canadians and South Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |